Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Penobscot County


DASH: A Meta-Attack Framework for Synthesizing Effective and Stealthy Adversarial Examples

Nafi, Abdullah Al Nomaan, Rahaman, Habibur, Haider, Zafaryab, Mahfuz, Tanzim, Suya, Fnu, Bhunia, Swarup, Chakraborty, Prabuddha

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Numerous techniques have been proposed for generating adversarial examples in white-box settings under strict Lp-norm constraints. However, such norm-bounded examples often fail to align well with human perception, and only recently have a few methods begun specifically exploring perceptually aligned adversarial examples. Moreover, it remains unclear whether insights from Lp-constrained attacks can be effectively leveraged to improve perceptual efficacy. In this paper, we introduce DAASH, a fully differentiable meta-attack framework that generates effective and perceptually aligned adversarial examples by strategically composing existing Lp-based attack methods. DAASH operates in a multi-stage fashion: at each stage, it aggregates candidate adversarial examples from multiple base attacks using learned, adaptive weights and propagates the result to the next stage. A novel meta-loss function guides this process by jointly minimizing misclassification loss and perceptual distortion, enabling the framework to dynamically modulate the contribution of each base attack throughout the stages. We evaluate DAASH on adversarially trained models across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet. Despite relying solely on Lp-constrained based methods, DAASH significantly outperforms state-of-the-art perceptual attacks such as AdvAD -- achieving higher attack success rates (e.g., 20.63\% improvement) and superior visual quality, as measured by SSIM, LPIPS, and FID (improvements $\approx$ of 11, 0.015, and 5.7, respectively). Furthermore, DAASH generalizes well to unseen defenses, making it a practical and strong baseline for evaluating robustness without requiring handcrafted adaptive attacks for each new defense.


GuideNav: User-Informed Development of a Vision-Only Robotic Navigation Assistant For Blind Travelers

Hwang, Hochul, Yang, Soowan, Monon, Jahir Sadik, Giudice, Nicholas A, Lee, Sunghoon Ivan, Biswas, Joydeep, Kim, Donghyun

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

While commendable progress has been made in user-centric research on mobile assistive systems for blind and low-vision (BLV) individuals, references that directly inform robot navigation design remain rare. To bridge this gap, we conducted a comprehensive human study involving interviews with 26 guide dog handlers, four white cane users, nine guide dog trainers, and one O\&M trainer, along with 15+ hours of observing guide dog-assisted walking. After de-identification, we open-sourced the dataset to promote human-centered development and informed decision-making for assistive systems for BLV people. Building on insights from this formative study, we developed GuideNav, a vision-only, teach-and-repeat navigation system. Inspired by how guide dogs are trained and assist their handlers, GuideNav autonomously repeats a path demonstrated by a sighted person using a robot. Specifically, the system constructs a topological representation of the taught route, integrates visual place recognition with temporal filtering, and employs a relative pose estimator to compute navigation actions - all without relying on costly, heavy, power-hungry sensors such as LiDAR. In field tests, GuideNav consistently achieved kilometer-scale route following across five outdoor environments, maintaining reliability despite noticeable scene variations between teach and repeat runs. A user study with 3 guide dog handlers and 1 guide dog trainer further confirmed the system's feasibility, marking (to our knowledge) the first demonstration of a quadruped mobile system retrieving a path in a manner comparable to guide dogs.



K-DAREK: Distance Aware Error for Kurkova Kolmogorov Networks

Ataei, Masoud, Dhiman, Vikas, Khojasteh, Mohammad Javad

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Neural networks are parametric and powerful tools for function approximation, and the choice of architecture heavily influences their interpretability, efficiency, and generalization. In contrast, Gaussian processes (GPs) are nonparametric probabilistic models that define distributions over functions using a kernel to capture correlations among data points. However, these models become computationally expensive for large-scale problems, as they require inverting a large covariance matrix. Kolmogorov- Arnold networks (KANs), semi-parametric neural architectures, have emerged as a prominent approach for modeling complex functions with structured and efficient representations through spline layers. Kurkova Kolmogorov-Arnold networks (KKANs) extend this idea by reducing the number of spline layers in KAN and replacing them with Chebyshev layers and multi-layer perceptrons, thereby mapping inputs into higher-dimensional spaces before applying spline-based transformations. Compared to KANs, KKANs perform more stable convergence during training, making them a strong architecture for estimating operators and system modeling in dynamical systems. By enhancing the KKAN architecture, we develop a novel learning algorithm, distance-aware error for Kurkova-Kolmogorov networks (K-DAREK), for efficient and interpretable function approximation with uncertainty quantification. Our approach establishes robust error bounds that are distance-aware; this means they reflect the proximity of a test point to its nearest training points. Through case studies on a safe control task, we demonstrate that K-DAREK is about four times faster and ten times higher computationally efficiency than Ensemble of KANs, 8.6 times more scalable than GP by increasing the data size, and 50% safer than our previous work distance-aware error for Kolmogorov networks (DAREK).



Whose Truth? Pluralistic Geo-Alignment for (Agentic) AI

Janowicz, Krzysztof, Liu, Zilong, Mai, Gengchen, Wang, Zhangyu, Majic, Ivan, Fortacz, Alexandra, McKenzie, Grant, Gao, Song

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

AI (super) alignment describes the challenge of ensuring (future) AI systems behave in accordance with societal norms and goals. While a quickly evolving literature is addressing biases and inequalities, the geographic variability of alignment remains underexplored. Simply put, what is considered appropriate, truthful, or legal can differ widely across regions due to cultural norms, political realities, and legislation. Alignment measures applied to AI/ML workflows can sometimes produce outcomes that diverge from statistical realities, such as text-to-image models depicting balanced gender ratios in company leadership despite existing imbalances. Crucially, some model outputs are globally acceptable, while others, e.g., questions about Kashmir, depend on knowing the user's location and their context. This geographic sensitivity is not new. For instance, Google Maps renders Kashmir's borders differently based on user location. What is new is the unprecedented scale and automation with which AI now mediates knowledge, expresses opinions, and represents geographic reality to millions of users worldwide, often with little transparency about how context is managed. As we approach Agentic AI, the need for spatio-temporally aware alignment, rather than one-size-fits-all approaches, is increasingly urgent. This paper reviews key geographic research problems, suggests topics for future work, and outlines methods for assessing alignment sensitivity.


Generating Privacy Stories From Software Documentation

Baldwin, Wilder, Chintakuntla, Shashank, Parajuli, Shreyah, Pourghasemi, Ali, Shanz, Ryan, Ghanavati, Sepideh

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

--Research shows that analysts and developers consider privacy as a security concept or as an afterthought, which may lead to non-compliance and violation of users' privacy. Most current approaches, however, focus on extracting legal requirements from the regulations and evaluating the compliance of software and processes with them. In this paper, we develop a novel approach based on chain-of-thought prompting (CoT), in-context-learning (ICL), and Large Language Models (LLMs) to extract privacy behaviors from various software documents prior to and during software development, and then generate privacy requirements in the format of user stories. Our results show that most commonly used LLMs, such as GPT -4o and Llama 3, can identify privacy behaviors and generate privacy user stories with F1 scores exceeding 0.8. We also show that the performance of these models could be improved through parameter-tuning. Our findings provide insight into using and optimizing LLMs for generating privacy requirements given software documents created prior to or throughout the software development lifecycle. Understanding the privacy behaviors of software applications and eliciting privacy requirements during the early phases of the software development lifecycle (SDLC) are essential for developing privacy-preserving and regulatory-compliant software [1], [2]. Past research, however, shows that software analysts and developers often consider privacy as a subset of security requirements or as an afterthought [3], [4], and they often lack the tools needed to understand and identify privacy behaviors of the applications they develop [5], [6]. Most common approaches for identifying and eliciting privacy requirements include conducting privacy impact assessments [7], [8], or employing goal-oriented methodologies to map privacy requirements to system processes [8]-[10]. Other works aim to extract privacy-related information from user stories or use case models [11]-[17] by leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and then using predefined templates to generate privacy requirements. However, these approaches mostly focus on the specific forms of software documentation (i.e., user stories or use cases), or they rely on developers to understand how personal information is handled by their applications.


Foundation Models for Geospatial Reasoning: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Understanding Geometries and Topological Spatial Relations

Ji, Yuhan, Gao, Song, Nie, Ying, Majić, Ivan, Janowicz, Krzysztof

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Applying AI foundation models directly to geospatial datasets remains challenging due to their limited ability to represent and reason with geographical entities, specifically vector-based geometries and natural language descriptions of complex spatial relations. To address these issues, we investigate the extent to which a well-known-text (WKT) representation of geometries and their spatial relations (e.g., topological predicates) are preserved during spatial reasoning when the geospatial vector data are passed to large language models (LLMs) including GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, and DeepSeek-R1-14B. Our workflow employs three distinct approaches to complete the spatial reasoning tasks for comparison, i.e., geometry embedding-based, prompt engineering-based, and everyday language-based evaluation. Our experiment results demonstrate that both the embedding-based and prompt engineering-based approaches to geospatial question-answering tasks with GPT models can achieve an accuracy of over 0.6 on average for the identification of topological spatial relations between two geometries. Among the evaluated models, GPT-4 with few-shot prompting achieved the highest performance with over 0.66 accuracy on topological spatial relation inference. Additionally, GPT-based reasoner is capable of properly comprehending inverse topological spatial relations and including an LLM-generated geometry can enhance the effectiveness for geographic entity retrieval. GPT-4 also exhibits the ability to translate certain vernacular descriptions about places into formal topological relations, and adding the geometry-type or place-type context in prompts may improve inference accuracy, but it varies by instance. The performance of these spatial reasoning tasks offers valuable insights for the refinement of LLMs with geographical knowledge towards the development of geo-foundation models capable of geospatial reasoning.


Position: Emergent Machina Sapiens Urge Rethinking Multi-Agent Paradigms

Li, Hepeng, Liu, Yuhong, Yan, Jun

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Artificially intelligent (AI) agents that are capable of autonomous learning and independent decision-making hold great promise for addressing complex challenges across domains like transportation, energy systems, and manufacturing. However, the surge in AI systems' design and deployment driven by various stakeholders with distinct and unaligned objectives introduces a crucial challenge: how can uncoordinated AI systems coexist and evolve harmoniously in shared environments without creating chaos? To address this, we advocate for a fundamental rethinking of existing multi-agent frameworks, such as multi-agent systems and game theory, which are largely limited to predefined rules and static objective structures. We posit that AI agents should be empowered to dynamically adjust their objectives, make compromises, form coalitions, and safely compete or cooperate through evolving relationships and social feedback. Through this paper, we call for a shift toward the emergent, self-organizing, and context-aware nature of these systems.


DAREK -- Distance Aware Error for Kolmogorov Networks

Ataei, Masoud, Khojasteh, Mohammad Javad, Dhiman, Vikas

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

In this paper, we provide distance-aware error bounds for Kolmogorov Arnold Networks (KANs). We call our new error bounds estimator DAREK -- Distance Aware Error for Kolmogorov networks. Z. Liu et al. provide error bounds, which may be loose, lack distance-awareness, and are defined only up to an unknown constant of proportionality. We review the error bounds for Newton's polynomial, which is then generalized to an arbitrary spline, under Lipschitz continuity assumptions. We then extend these bounds to nested compositions of splines, arriving at error bounds for KANs. We evaluate our method by estimating an object's shape from sparse laser scan points. We use KAN to fit a smooth function to the scans and provide error bounds for the fit. We find that our method is faster than Monte Carlo approaches, and that our error bounds enclose the true obstacle shape reliably.